The Three Horizons Framework: How Investors Think About Growth, Focus, and Long-Term Value

Fundraising
Published:
December 1, 2025

The Three Horizons Framework: How Investors Think About Growth, Focus, and Long-Term Value

One of the hardest balances for founders—and one of the first things investors test—is this:

How do you grow aggressively without losing focus or control?

Founders often swing to extremes:

  • Either they focus only on today's traction and look short-sighted
  • Or they focus only on vision and look unrealistic

The Three Horizons Framework, developed at McKinsey, is a powerful way to resolve this tension. Investors use it—explicitly or intuitively—to evaluate whether a company can deliver short-term results while building long-term value.

Applied correctly, it strengthens pitch decks, roadmaps, and investor confidence.

What Is The Three Horizons Framework?

The framework divides growth into three time horizons:

  • Horizon 1 – Core Business (Today)
    • Current product
    • Current customers
    • Current revenue
  • Horizon 2 – Emerging Growth (Next)
    • Adjacent markets
    • New features or use cases
    • Expanding customer segments
  • Horizon 3 – Future Options (Long-Term)
    • Transformational ideas
    • New business models
    • Long-term vision

The key insight: all three horizons must exist simultaneously, but with different levels of focus and investment.

How Investors Use The Three Horizons (Even If They Don't Say It)

When investors review a pitch, they subconsciously ask:

  • Is Horizon 1 strong enough to survive?
  • Is Horizon 2 credible enough to scale?
  • Is Horizon 3 compelling enough to justify venture returns?

Founders who can answer all three—without confusion or overreach—feel fundable.

Applying The Three Horizons In A Pitch Deck

Horizon 1: Proving Today's Business Is Real

This is where most investor trust is built.

Investors look for:

  • Real customers
  • Real usage
  • Real revenue or traction
  • Clear problem–solution fit

Common founder mistake:Talking about vision before proving the core business works.

How to show Horizon 1 well:

  • Traction slides
  • Revenue trends
  • Customer proof
  • Clear ICP definition

If Horizon 1 is weak, Horizons 2 and 3 don't matter yet.

Horizon 2: Showing Credible Paths To Scale

Horizon 2 answers:

"What's the next logical growth lever once the core works?"

This might include:

  • New geographies
  • New customer segments
  • Upsells or expansions
  • Adjacent use cases

Investor focus:Is this growth logical, or speculative?

How to show Horizon 2:

  • Roadmap slides
  • Go-to-market expansion logic
  • Early pilots or signals
  • Clear prioritization

Strong Horizon 2 thinking shows discipline, not ambition.

Horizon 3: Justifying Venture-Scale Outcomes

Horizon 3 is not a feature roadmap—it's an option space.

It answers:

"Why could this company be 10–100× larger in the long run?"

Examples:

  • Platform potential
  • Ecosystem effects
  • Market restructuring
  • Category creation

Common founder mistake:Over-investing in Horizon 3 too early.

How to show Horizon 3 correctly:

  • As optionality, not commitment
  • As a logical extension of Horizons 1 and 2
  • Without timelines or promises

Horizon 3 creates upside—not execution pressure.

Join us on the path to excellence
Get free consulting
Get free consulting
arrowarrow

Capital Allocation Across Horizons (What Investors Care About Most)

Sophisticated investors pay close attention to:

  • Where capital goes today
  • Where optionality is preserved
  • Where focus is protected

A strong signal looks like:

  • 70–80% focus on Horizon 1
  • 15–25% on Horizon 2
  • 5–10% exploratory Horizon 3

This balance signals maturity and judgment.

Common Pitch Deck Mistakes The Three Horizons Fixes

Using this framework helps avoid:

  • "All vision, no traction" decks
  • Overloaded roadmaps
  • Confusing short-term vs long-term priorities
  • Investor fear of distraction

Emily Carter
(CHRO)
“Consectetur quam a felis vehicula pretium morbi eget velit non eros lacinia porta at a ligula. Donec a orci sed tellus iaculis scelerisque. Vivamus nisi ante convallis ac finibus.”